Multiplex immunoassays for hemoglobin, hemoglobin variants, and glycated forms

ABSTRACT

Hemoglobin, its variants, and glycated forms of each are determined individually in a multiplex assay that permits correction of the measured level of HbA1c to account for glycated variants and other factors related to the inclusion of the variants in the sample. New antibodies that are particularly well adapted to the multiplex assay are also provided.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION

This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/262,488, filed Nov. 18, 2009, the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

1. Field of the Invention

This invention lies in the field of assays for glycated hemoglobin.

2. Description of the Prior Art

For individuals suffering from type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus, maintenance of glycemic control is of prime importance, and such maintenance requires the determination of the level of hemoglobin A_(1c) in the blood of these individuals. With diabetes reaching global epidemic proportions, it is particularly important to have accurate and reproducible HbA_(1c) assays. HbA_(1c) assays are also used in the screening of individuals for diabetes.

HbA_(1c) measurements for both patient monitoring and screening are taken as an average over the lifetime of an erythrocyte. This average is compromised by several physiological conditions, notable among which are the presence of hemoglobin variants and thalassemias in the patient's blood. Hemoglobin variants are prevalent among certain ethnic groups and in certain geographical regions. Of the over 800 variants known worldwide, the most common are HbS, HbC, HbD, and HbE. HbS is most prevalent among individuals of African descent, HbD among individuals of Punjabi Indian descent, and HbE among individuals of Southeast Asia. Other known forms of hemoglobin are HbF (fetal hemoglobin) and HbA2, both of which can be elevated in thalassemia, a relatively common condition characterized by an imbalance of hemoglobin alpha and beta subunits. Beta thalassemias can also occur in the presence of HbE and HbS, and the combined sickle/beta thalassemia trait occurs most frequently among individuals of Mediterranean descent. Variants and thalassemias can cause inaccuracies in HbA_(1c) measurements by affecting such factors as red blood cell survival and glycosylation rates. Variants also affect immunologically determined levels of glycated hemoglobin since immunoreactivity differs from one glycated variant to the next and also between glycated variants and HbA itself. Health care professionals must therefore know of the presence of variants and their proportions relative to HbA as well as the presence of thalassemias to achieve a proper determination of glycemic control.

Determinations of hemoglobin variants are typically done separately from determinations of HbA_(1c) regardless of whether a variant is actually known to be present. Antibodies to specific variants have been developed for this purpose, and the following is a sampling of reports on such antibodies:

-   HbS: Jensen, R. H., et al., “Monoclonal antibodies specific for     sickle cell hemoglobin,” Hemoglobin 9(4), 349-362 (1985) -   HbS: Epstein, N., et al., “Monoclonal antibody-based methods for     quantitation of hemoglobins: application to evaluating patients with     sickle cell anemia treated with hydroxyurea,” Eur. J. Haemotol.     57(1), 17-24 (1996) -   HbA: Rosenthal, M. A., et al., “Binding specificity of a monoclonal     antibody to human HbA,” Hemoglobin 19(3-4), 191-196 (1995) -   HbS and HbC: Garver, E. A., et al., “Screening for hemoglobins S and     C in newborn and adult blood with a monoclonal antibody in an ELISA     procedure,” Annals of Hematology 60(6), 334-338 (1990) -   Hb with single amino acid substitutions: Stanker, L. H., et al.,     “Monoclonal antibodies recognizing single amino acid substitutions     in hemoglobin,” J. Immunol. 136 (11), 4174-4180 (1986) -   Hb variants: Moscoso. H., et al., “Enzyme immunoassay for the     identification of hemoglobin variants,” Hemoglobin 14(4), 389-98     (1990) -   Hb variants: Schultz, J. C., “Utilization of monoclonal     antibody-based assay HemoCard in screening for and differentiating     between genotypes of sickle cell disease and other     hemoglobinopathies,” J. Clin. Lab. Anal. 9(6), 366-374 (1995)

Despite these reports and others, determinations of variants are presently performed by either high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) or electrophoresis. HPLC can indeed be a rapid means of obtaining the HbA_(1c) level, but extended HPLC gradients are needed for detecting and quantifying the variants and thalassemias, since in HPLC impurities co-elute with the variants, and different variants tend to co-elute with each other. In fact, certain variants cannot be resolved by HPLC, even with the most optimized HPLC gradients. Typically, separate HPLC methods for rapid A_(1c) measurements and variant and thalassemia testing are used, therefore making it impossible to simultaneously determine the A_(1c) level and variant or thalassemia status by HPLC, much less in a rapid manner.

Assays that provide simultaneous detection of multiple analytes are termed “multiplex” assays, and disclosures of multiplex assays using affinity-type binding reactions on the surfaces of beads that are then detected by flow cytometry are disclosed in the following patents:

-   Watkins, M. I., et al., “Magnetic particles as solid phase for     multiplex flow assays,” U.S. Pat. No. 6,280,618 B2, issued Aug. 28,     2001 -   Watkins, M. I., et al., “Magnetic particles as solid phase for     multiplex flow assays,” U.S. Pat. No. 6,872,578 B2, issued Mar. 29,     2005 -   Thomas, N., “Multiple assay method,” U.S. Pat. No. 6,913,935 B1,     issued Jul. 5, 2005 -   Hechinger, M., “Platelet immunoglobulin bead suspension and flow     cytometry,” U.S. Pat. No. 6,933,106 B1, issued Aug. 23, 2005 -   Hechinger, M., “Anti-platelet immunoglobulin bead positive control,”     U.S. Pat. No. 6,951,716 B1, issued Oct. 4, 2005 -   Watkins, M. I., et al., “Multi-analyte diagnostic test for thyroid     disorders,” U.S. Pat. No. 7,271,009 B1, issued Sep. 8, 2007 -   Bell, M. L., “Assay procedures and apparatus,” U.S. Pat. No.     7,326,573 B2, issued Feb. 5, 2008 -   Song, Y., et al., “Multiplex protein interaction determinations     using glutathione-GST binding,” US 2002/0115116 A1, published Aug.     22, 2002

The success of multiplex assays for certain combinations of analytes does not however provide assurance, or even a high level of expectation, that similar success will be achieved for all combinations of analytes, particularly combinations with a high level of homology among the analytes. Hemoglobin and its variants and glycated forms are one such combination. Multiplex assays involve a plurality of different immunoreactants in intimate mixture in a common reaction medium, which creates competition among the immunoreactants for the different analytes, more so than in media where a single immunoreactant is present, and the cross-reactivities occur in multiple directions. The bead sets themselves must also be differentiated at the same time as the immunoassays are performed. This differentiation, whether by the use of different dyes on different bead sets, a different size for each bead set, or other known differentiation factors, adds a further level of complexity and further opportunities for cross-talk.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention resides in the discovery that hemoglobin variants can be differentiated from each other and from HbA_(1c) and from total hemoglobin, and the levels of each measured, in a multiplex immunoassay. The assay can, e.g., detect a single variant in addition to HbA_(1c) and total hemoglobin or two or more variants and total hemoglobin. When two or more variants are detected, different combinations of variants can be selected, although preferably the assay will include the four most common variants, HbS, HbC, HbE, and HbD. The assay may also include the measurement of HbA₂ and HbF. The invention thus resides in a method for detecting and identifying the presence of hemoglobin variants in a patient's blood. The invention also resides in a method for measuring the level of HbA1c relative to total hemoglobin while correcting the result for the presence of variants that may also be present. Here as well, the correction can be for individual variants or combinations of variants. The invention also resides in a method for the simultaneous detection of A_(1c) and hemoglobin variants without correction, which is useful in certain cases. A still further aspect of the invention is the measurement of levels of particular variants in glycated form. When a variant is known to be present, the glycated version of that variant can be measured and added to the level of HbA_(1c) to obtain an accurate indication of total glycated hemoglobin.

In a further aspect, the invention provides antibodies having selective binding affinity for hemoglobin variants that can be used in the methods of the invention. In some embodiments, the invention provides a monoclonal antibody that has selective binding affinity for HbC and glycated HbC, wherein the monoclonal antibody binds to an HbC minimal epitope ⁴TPKEKSAVT¹²; or to an HbC minimal epitope comprising the amino acid sequence TX₁KE or LTX₁KE, wherein X₁ is one of the 20 common naturally occurring amino acids. In some embodiments, the invention provides a monoclonal antibody having selective binding affinity for HbS and glycated HbS, wherein the monoclonal antibody binds to an HbS minimal epitope ³LTPVEKSAVT¹²; or to an HbS minimal epitope comprising the amino acid sequence PVEX₂X₃A or LTPVEX₂X₃A, wherein each of X₂ and X₃ is an amino acid independently selected from the 20 common naturally occurring amino acids. In some embodiments, the invention provides a monoclonal antibody having selective binding affinity for HbE and glycated HbE, wherein the antibody binds to an HbE minimal epitope ²²EVGGK²⁶; or to an HbE minimal epitope comprising the amino acid sequence DEVGGK or EVX₄X₅K, wherein each of X₄ and X₅ is an amino acid independently selected from the 20 common naturally occurring amino acids. In some embodiments, the invention provides a monoclonal antibody having selective binding affinity for HbD and glycated HbD, where the monoclonal antibody binds to an HbD minimal epitope ¹²¹QFTPP¹²⁵; or to an HbD minimal epitope comprising the amino acid sequence GX₆QFX₇PP or QFX₇PP, wherein each of X₆ and X₇ is an amino acid independently selected from the 20 common naturally occurring amino acids.

The invention also may employ an antibody, either a polyclonal antibody or monoclonal antibody that selectively binds total hemoglobin (in comparison to non-hemoglobin polypeptides). In some embodiments, a pan-reactive polyclonal antibody for use in the invention binds to one or more epitopes present in the following regions of alpha globin and beta globin: ⁴⁹SHGSAQVKGHGKKVADALTNAVAHVDDMPNALSALSDHLHA HKLRRVDPV⁹⁶, beta globin ¹⁵WGKVNVDEVGGEALG³⁰, ⁴⁵FGDLSTP⁵¹, and ⁷⁶AHLDNLKGTFAT⁸⁷. In some embodiments, a pan reactive antibody is a monoclonal or polyclonal antibody that binds to the epitope ⁹SAVTALWGKVNV²⁰ (beta globin) or ⁸KSAVTALWGKVNV²⁰ or ¹¹VTALW¹⁵ or to a beta globin minimal epitope that comprises the sequence ALWG or VTX₉LW, wherein X₉ is one of the 20 common naturally occurring amino acids. An antibody for use in the invention may bind to an epitope on beta globin, e.g. ⁸KSAVTALWGKVNV²⁰, ⁵⁸PKVKAHGKKVLGAF⁷¹ or ⁸⁷TLSELHCDKLHVDPENFR¹⁰⁴ (beta globin).

The invention further provides monoclonal antibodies that selectively bind to glycated forms of hemoglobin, including binding to both normal and variant hemoglobins, but do not bind to non-glycated forms of hemoglobin. A glycosylated residue ¹V and residue ²H are typically important for binding for such antibodies.

The method of the invention may additionally comprise detecting other hemoglobin variants using antibodies, e.g., monoclonal antibodies, that selectively bind such variants.

In typical embodiments, an antibody for use in the invention has a K_(D) that is anywhere in the range of from about 10⁻⁶M to about 10⁻¹² M. In some embodiments, the antibody has a K_(D) that is anywhere in the range of from about 10⁻⁷ M to about 10⁻¹¹ M. In other embodiments, the antibody has a K_(D) anywhere in the range of about 10⁻⁸ M to about 10⁻¹⁰ M. Typically the K_(D) is in the nM range, e.g., anywhere from about 10⁻⁹M to about 10⁻¹⁰ M.

These and other features, objects, and advantages of the invention will be better understood from the description that follows.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES

FIG. 1 provides a schematic depicting an example of a sandwich immunoassay for measuring glycated hemoglobin and hemoglobin variants.

FIG. 2 is a plot of comparative data between a series of multiplex assays in accordance with the present invention and a series of HPLC assays.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION AND PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

The hemoglobin variants to be detected by the present invention are any of the known variants reported in the literature or otherwise known to clinicians and researchers skilled in technology of hemoglobin, glycated hemoglobin, and diabetes. As noted above, the four most common hemoglobin variants are HbS, HbC, HbE, and HbD, although other variants can be detected in addition to these four or in place of one or more of them. For example, two variants that are elevated in beta thalassemia are HbF and HbA₂. The binding members used for each of these variants in the multiplex assay are generally monoclonal antibodies, preferably those that are developed expressly for the multiplex assay. The antibodies preferably bind to epitopes on the variants that distinguish each variant from the other variants to minimize cross-reactivity, and most importantly that distinguish the variants from the wild-type hemoglobin A0. In embodiments of the invention requiring the use of a value for the concentration of total hemoglobin in the sample, the concentration can be determined either by an immunoassay method or a non-immunoassay method. An example of a non-immunoassay method is the determination of optical density. Other examples will be readily apparent to those skilled in the hemoglobin art. In embodiments where total hemoglobin is determined by immunoassay, the determination can be performed as part of the multiplex assay. The antibody for total hemoglobin in the multiplex assay can be either a monoclonal antibody or a polyclonal antibody, and the antibody for HbA_(1c) can be either a polyclonal antibody or a monoclonal antibody, preferably a monoclonal antibody.

Antibodies

As used herein, an “antibody” refers to a protein functionally defined as a binding protein and structurally defined as comprising an amino acid sequence that is recognized by one of skill as being derived from the framework region of an immunoglobulin-encoding gene of an animal that produces antibodies. An antibody can consist of one or more polypeptides substantially encoded by immunoglobulin genes or fragments of immunoglobulin genes. The recognized immunoglobulin genes include the kappa, lambda, alpha, gamma, delta, epsilon and mu constant region genes, as well as myriad immunoglobulin variable region genes. Light chains are classified as either kappa or lambda. Heavy chains are classified as gamma, mu, alpha, delta, or epsilon, which in turn define the immunoglobulin classes, IgG, IgM, IgA, IgD and IgE, respectively.

A typical immunoglobulin (antibody) structural unit is known to comprise a tetramer. Each tetramer is composed of two identical pairs of polypeptide chains, each pair having one “light” (about 25 kD) and one “heavy” chain (about 50 kD). The N-terminus of each chain defines a variable region of about 100 to 110 or more amino acids primarily responsible for antigen recognition. The terms variable light chain (V_(L)) and variable heavy chain (V_(H)) refer to these light and heavy chains, respectively.

The term antibody as used herein includes antibody fragments that retain binding specificity. For example, there are a number of well characterized antibody fragments. Thus, for example, pepsin digests an antibody C-terminal to the disulfide linkages in the hinge region to produce F(ab)′2, a dimer of Fab which itself is a light chain joined to VH-CH1 (Fd) by a disulfide bond. The F(ab)′2 may be reduced under mild conditions to break the disulfide linkage in the hinge region thereby converting the (Fab′)2 dimer into an Fab′ monomer. The Fab′ monomer is essentially a Fab with all or part of the hinge region (see, Fundamental Immunology, W. E. Paul, ed., Raven Press, N.Y. (1993), for a more detailed description of other antibody fragments). While various antibody fragments are defined in terms of the digestion of an intact antibody, one of skill will appreciate that fragments can be synthesized de novo either chemically or by utilizing recombinant DNA methodology. Thus, the term “antibody” also includes antibody fragments produced either by the modification of whole antibodies or synthesized using recombinant DNA methodologies. Antibodies include dimers such as V_(H)-V_(L) dimers, V_(H) dimers, or V_(L) dimers, including single chain antibodies. Alternatively, the antibody can be another fragment, such as a disulfide-stabilized Fv (dsFv). Other fragments can also be generated using known techniques, including using recombinant techniques. In some embodiments, antibodies include those that have been displayed on phage or generated by recombinant technology using vectors where the chains are secreted as soluble proteins, e.g., scFv, Fv, Fab, (Fab′)2 or generated by recombinant technology using vectors where the chains are secreted as soluble proteins.

As used here, an “immunological binding member having selective binding affinity” for an antigen, e.g., a hemoglobin variant, is typically an antibody. In some embodiments, a binding member having selective binding affinity for an antigen may be a peptide, e.g., that can be identified by screening peptide libraries, that has a selective binding interaction with the antigen.

In one aspect, the invention provides monoclonal antibodies that bind to Hb A_(1c) as well as monoclonal antibodies that specifically bind to hemoglobin variants HbS, HbC, HbE, and HbD. The sequence of hemoglobin beta chain is as follows:

VHLTPEEKSAVTALWGKVNVDEVGGEALGRLLVVYPWTQRFFESFGDLST PDAVMGNPKVKAHGKKVLGAFSDGLAHLDNLKGTFATLSELHCDKLHVDP ENFRLLGNVLVCVLAHHFGKEFTPPVQAAYQKVVAGVANALAHKYH The positions of amino acid residues in the hemoglobin beta chain referred to herein is with reference to this amino acid sequence unless otherwise specified.

Hb A_(1c) is glycated at the N-terminal valine. The most prevalent beta-chain point mutations are HbS (Glu 6→Val); HbC (Glu 6→Lys); HbE (Glu 26→Lys) and HbD (Glu 121→Gln). The Glu 6, Glu 26, and Glu 121 positions are indicated in the beta chain sequence by underline.

HbA₂ and HbF can also be determined in the assay of the present invention. Hemoglobin A₂ has two alpha chains and two delta chains; and hemoglobin F has two alpha and two gamma chains.

In the context of this invention, the term “specifically binds” or “specifically (or selectively) immunoreactive with,” or “having a selective affinity for” refers to a binding reaction where the antibody binds to the antigen of interest. In the context of this invention, the antibody binds to the antigen of interest, e.g., HbS, including the glycated form of HbS, with an affinity that is at least 100-fold better than its affinity for other antigens, e.g., other hemoglobin variants such as HbA₀ or HbC.

“Reactivity” as used herein refers to the relative binding signal from the reactions of an antibody with the antigen to which it specifically binds versus other antigens, such as other hemoglobin variants and or wild-type HbA₀. Reactivity is assessed using appropriate buffers that permit the antigen and antibody to bind. Reactivity can be determined, e.g., using a direct or sandwich ELISA assay. For example, a direct format assay for determining reactivity with wildtype hemoglobin and/or hemoglobin variants, can be used in which the antigen is directly bound to the ELISA plate, and the various antibodies are added to see which ones bind, followed by interrogation using a labeled anti-mouse antibody such as a phycoerythrin-labeled antibody. In the sandwich format, the monoclonal antibody is bound to the bead, followed by addition of antigen, followed by interrogation with phycoerythrin-labeled universal detection antibody, e.g., a phycoerythrin-labeled universal detection antibody, that binds all hemoglobin species. Thus, in an example using the sandwich format, reactivity can be defined as the relative fluorescent signal produced when the specific antigen, e.g., an HbS hemoglobin variant, is bound versus another antigen, e.g., a wildtype hemoglobin. An antibody is considered to be specific for an antigen if it exhibits a 2-fold, typically at least a 3- or 4-fold increase, in reactivity for the reference antigen compared to another antigen that is tested.

“Epitope” or “antigenic determinant” refers to a site on an antigen to which an antibody binds. Epitopes can be formed both from contiguous amino acids or noncontiguous amino acids juxtaposed by tertiary folding of a protein. Epitopes formed from contiguous amino acids are typically retained on exposure to denaturing solvents whereas epitopes formed by tertiary folding are typically lost on treatment with denaturing solvents. An epitope typically includes at least 3, and more usually, at least 5 or 8-10 amino acids in a unique spatial conformation. Methods of epitope mapping are well known in the art (see, e.g., Epitope Mapping Protocols in Methods in Molecular Biology, Vol. 66, Glenn E. Morris, Ed (1996)). A “minimal” epitope in the current invention is typically determined by measuring binding of the antibody to overlapping peptides covering the entire amino acid sequence of beta or alpha globin and identifying the amino acid sequence shared by all bound peptides. Important amino acids in the “minimal” epitope are typically identified by alanine scanning.

As understood in the art, a “minimal” epitope may include substitutions, e.g., at positions that are not important for binding, e.g., as determined using alanine scanning. Such substitutions include conservative substitutions where the alteration results in the substitution of an amino acid with a chemically similar amino acid. Conservative substitution tables providing functionally similar amino acids are well known in the art. The following are examples from among the twenty common naturally occurring amino acids of amino acids that may be substituted for one another: alanine and glycine; aspartic acid and glutamic acid; asparagine and glutamine; arginine and lysine; serine and threonine. Other conservative substitutions include substitutions of one amino acid in the following group with another amino acid in the group: isoleucine, leucine, methionine, and valine. Phenylalanine, tyrosine, and tryptophan are also examples of residues that may be substituted for one another.

Table 1 provides examples of immunogens utilized to generate specific monoclonal antibodies to hemoglobin and hemoglobin variants.

TABLE 1 Examples of Peptide Immunogens Hemoglobin Peptide target Name sequence Hemoglobin H1 H2N-VHLTPEEKSAVTALW-C-CONH2 and H2 H2N-VHLTPEEASASTASW-C-CONH2 variants H2bis H2N-VHLTPEEKSASTASW-C-CONH2 HbS H3 H2N-VHLTPVEKSAVTALW-C-CONH2 HbC H4 H2N-VHLTPKEKSAVTALW-C-CONH2 HbE H5 H2N-CYG-NVDEVGGKALGRLLV-CONH2 H5bis H2N-CYG-VTALWGKVNVDEVGGK-CONH2 H10 H2N-C-Hx-EVGGKALG-CONH2 H10bis H2N-EVGGKALG-Hx-C-CONH2 HbD H6 H2N-CYG-VLAHHFGKQFTPPVQAA-CONH2 H6bis H2N-QFTPPVQAAYQKVVAGV-GYC-CONH2 H9 H2N-GKQFTGKQFTGKQFT-GYC-CONH2 H11 H2N-C-Hx-HFGKQFTP-CONH2 H11bis H2N-HFGKQFTP-Hx-C-CONH2 HbA1_(c) GP1 Glucose-HN-VHLTPEE-Hx-C-CONH2 GP3 1-deoxyfructopyranosyl-HN- VHLTPEE-Hx-C-CONH2 Glycated Glucose-HN-VHLTPEEASASTASW-C- H2 CONH2

Table 2 provides examples of immunization regimens utilized to generate specific monoclonal antibodies to hemoglobin and hemoglobin variants.

TABLE 2 Examples of immunization regimens Injection HbA and sequence HbS HbC HbE HbD HbA1c variants 1 native HbS H4-KLH H5bis-KLH denatured HbD + GP3-KLH native HbA0 antigen H6-KLH 2 H3-KLH H4-KLH H5bis-KLH denatured HbD + GP3-KLH H1-KLH H6-KLH 3 H3-KLH H4-KLH H5bis-KLH denatured HbD + GP3-KLH native HbA0 H6-KLH 4 denatured HbS + denatured HbC H5bis-KLH denatured HbD + GP3-KLH H1-KLH H3-KLH H6-KLH 5 denatured HbS + H4-KLH denatured HbE denatured HbD + H3-KLH H6-KLH 6 denatured HbS + H4-KLH denatured HbE denatured HbD H3-KLH 7 denatured HbE denatured HbD + H6-KLH 8 H5bis-KLH denatured HbD + H6-KLH 9 H5bis-KLH denatured HbD + H6-KLH 10  denatured HbE + denatured HbD + H5bis-KLH H6-KLH 11  denatured HbE + H5bis-KLH 12  Subcutaneous Subcutaneous denatured HbE + Subcutaneous Intraperitoneal Subcutaneous Route of injection And and H5bis-KLH and and intraperitoneal intraperitoneal Subcutaneous intraperitoneal intraperitoneal and intraperitoneal

HbS Antibodies

Hemoglobin variant HbS has a point mutation in which glutamic acid at position 6 of the hemoglobin beta chain is mutated to a valine.

Anti-HbS antibodies of the invention that are selective for HbS have the following binding characteristics: the antibody bind to HbS with an affinity that is at least 100-fold lower (i.e., better) than its affinity for HbC and HbA0. In some embodiments, the antibody binds to the minimal HbS epitope ⁵PVEKSAVT¹². Such an antibody may have a reactivity in which the reactivity is such that the valine at position 6 can be replaced by an isoleucine, but replacement with other amino acids at that position results in a 2-fold, often a three-fold or greater decrease in reactivity. In some embodiments, ³LTP⁵, ⁷E, and ¹⁰A are also important for binding.

In some embodiments, the antibody binds to a minimal epitope ³LTPVEKSAVT¹². In some embodiments, the antibody may have a reactivity where the valine at position 6 can be replaced by an isoleucine or alanine, but substitution with other amino acids at that positions results in a two-fold, often a three-fold or greater decrease in reactivity. In some embodiments, ²HLTPVEK⁸ and ¹⁰A are also important for binding.

In some embodiments, an antibody that binds to an HbS minimal epitope, e.g., ⁵PVEKSAVT¹², may bind to variants of the HbS minimal epitope that have the valine at position 6, such as a minimal epitope comprising ⁵PVEX₂X₃A¹⁰, where X₂ and X₃ can be independently selected from the 20 common naturally occurring amino acids, e.g., conservative substitutions of K and S, respectively.

The antibody typically is an IgG, e.g., the antibody may have an IgG1, IgG2, or IgG3 isotype. In some embodiments, the light chain constant region is a kappa chain. In other embodiments, the light chain constant region may be a lambda chain.

In one embodiment, an HbS antibody of the invention is raised against the immunogen HbS and H3-KLH:H₂N-VHLTPVEKSAVTALW-C-CONH₂. In other embodiments, the immunogen is either a combination of H3-KLH:H₂N-VHLTPVEKSAVTALW-C-CONH₂ and purified native and/or denatured HbS protein, or sequential or serial immunizations using the individual components of the above immunogens. Carrier proteins other than KLH can also be used. Examples are albumin and ovalbumin, and further examples will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art.

As understood in the art and illustrated by Table 1 above, many variations of immunogens can be used to obtain the desired antibody. For example, peptide immunogen KLH:H₂N-VHLTPVEKSAVTALW-C-CONH₂ may also have a C-terminal carboxylate, rather than a C-terminal carboxamide. In some embodiments, the cysteine linker moiety may be spaced with a Hx residue, which is 6-amino hexanoic acid, or a spacer, such as a gly-gly spacer sequence may be employed. Further, the peptide sequence may also vary.

An anti-HbS antibody typically binds to both glycated and nonglycated forms of HbS with similar affinity. For example, an anti-HbS antibody typically selectively binds to both glycated and non-glycated HbS with a binding reactivity in which there is less than a three-fold reactivity difference, typically less than a two-fold reactivity difference, between binding to glycated vs. non-glycated HbS.

Anti-HbC Antibodies

Hemoglobin variant HbC has a lysine substituted for the glutamic acid at position 6 of the hemoglobin beta chain. An anti-HbC monoclonal antibody for use in the invention typically binds to HbC with an affinity that is at least 100 times greater that the affinity of the antibody for HbS and HbA0. In some embodiments, the monoclonal antibody binds to the minimal epitope ⁴TPKEKSAVT¹². In some embodiments, the antibody has a binding specificity such that residues important for binding are residues ³LT⁴ and ⁶K. In some embodiments, residues important for binding may be ³LT⁴ and ⁶KE⁷. The binding specificity also allows for substitution of lysine by arginine or histidine at position 6, but substitution of other amino acids results in at least a 2-fold, typically a 3-fold or greater loss in reactivity. In other embodiments, the reactivity of the HbC antibody is such that the lysine at position 6 may be substituted with an arginine, tyrosine, asparagine, glutamine or glycine, but substitution with other amino acids residues results in a loss of reactivity.

In some embodiments, an antibody that binds to a HbC minimal epitope, e.g., ⁴TPKEKSAVT¹², may bind to variants of the HbC minimal epitope that have the K at position 6, such as a minimal epitope comprising ⁴TX₁KE⁷ or ³LTX₁KE⁷ where X₁ can be one of the 20 common naturally occurring amino acids.

The antibody typically is an IgG, e.g., the antibody may have an IgG1, IgG2, or IgG3 isotype. In some embodiments, the light chain constant region is a kappa chain. In other embodiments, the light chain constant region may be a lambda chain.

An antibody of the invention may be raised against the immunogen H4-KLH:H₂N-VHLTPKEKSAVTALW-C-CONH₂. Examples of other peptide immunogens are listed in Table 1, and here again, other common carrier proteins can be used in place of KLH. In some embodiments, the immunization is performed using a combination of the peptide and purified native and/or denatured HbC protein. In some embodiments, sequential or serial immunizations are performed using the individual components of the above immunogens. An exemplary immunization protocol is shown in Table 2. As explained above in the section relating to anti-HbS antibodies, one of skill can readily design other immunogenic peptides to obtain an antibody having the desired HbC binding specificity.

An anti-HbC antibody typically binds to both glycated and nonglycated forms of HbC with similar affinity. For example, an anti-HbC antibody typically selectively binds to both glycated and non-glycated HbC with a binding reactivity in which there is less than a three-fold reactivity difference, typically less than a two-fold reactivity difference, between binding to glycated vs. non-glycated HbC.

Anti-HbE Antibodies

HbE has a lysine substituted for the glutamic acid at position 26 of the hemoglobin beta chain. An anti-HbE monoclonal antibody of the invention is typically at least 4-fold or 5-fold more reactive, often at least 10-fold more reactive, with HbE in comparison to HbA. In some embodiments, the monoclonal antibody binds to the minimal epitope ²²EVGGK²⁶. In some embodiments such an anti-Hb-E antibody has a binding specificity for ²²EVGGK²⁶ that is dependent on ²²E and in which ²¹D, ²³V, and ²⁶K are important for binding. In some embodiments, the antibody has a binding specificity that is dependent on E22 and in which D21, V23 and K26 are important for binding. In some embodiments, the antibody has a binding specificity such that substitution of the K at position 26 with S, T A, R, Q or G preserves at least 50%, typically at least 70% or greater of the binding activity. In some embodiments, substitution of the K at position 26 with S, T, A, R or V preserves at least 50%, typically at least 70% or greater, of the binding activity.

In some embodiments, an antibody that binds to a HbE minimal epitope, e.g., ²²EVGGK²⁶ may bind to variants of the HbE minimal epitope that have the K at position 26, such as a minimal epitope comprising ²¹DEVGGK²⁶ or ²²EVX₄X₅K²⁶, where X₄ and X₅ can be independently selected from the 20 common naturally occurring amino acids, e.g., conservative substitutions of G.

The antibody typically is an IgG, e.g., the antibody may have an IgG1, IgG2, or IgG3 isotype. In some embodiments, the light chain constant region is a kappa chain. In other embodiments, the light chain constant region may be a lambda chain.

An anti-HbE antibody of the invention can be obtained, e.g., using the immunogen H5bis-KLH:H₂N-CYG-VTALWGKVNVDEVGGK-CONH₂. In some embodiments, the antibody is raised against an immunogen H5bis-KLH:H₂N-CYG-VTALWGKVNVDEVGGK-CONH₂ with mixtures or sequential injections of peptide, native HbE antigen, and HbE denatured antigen. Examples of peptide immunogens are provided in Table 1. Peptide immunogens can be used in combination with one another, either with or without denatured or native HbE. Exemplary immunization protocols are provided in Table 2. As explained above in the section relating to anti-HbS antibodies, one of skill can readily design other immunogenic peptides to obtain an antibody having the desired HbE binding specificity. The reader is again referred to Table 1 for examples of other peptide immunogens.

An anti-HbE antibody typically binds to both glycated and nonglycated forms of HbE with similar affinity. For example, an anti-HbE antibody typically selectively binds to both glycated and non-glycated HbE with a binding reactivity in which there is less than a three-fold reactivity difference, typically less than a two-fold reactivity difference, between binding to glycated vs. non-glycated HbE.

Anti-HbD Antibodies

HbD has a glutamine substituted for a glutamic acid at position 121 of the hemoglobin beta chain. An anti-HbD monoclonal antibody of the invention is typically at least 3-fold, or greater more reactive with HbD in comparison to HbA. In some embodiments, the antibody binds to the minimal epitope ¹²¹QFTPP¹²⁵ In some embodiments, the antibody has a binding specificity where residues ¹¹⁹G, ¹²¹QF¹²², and ¹²⁴PP¹²⁵ are important for binding.

In some embodiments, an antibody that binds to a HbD minimal epitope, e.g., ¹²¹QFTPP¹²⁵, hd may bind to variants of the HbE minimal epitope that have the Q at position 121, such as a minimal epitope comprising ¹¹⁹GX₆QFX₇PP¹²⁵ or ¹²¹QFX₇PP¹²⁵, where X₆ and X₇ can be independently selected from the 20 common naturally occurring amino acids, e.g., conservative substitutions of K and T, respectively.

The antibody typically is an IgG, e.g., the antibody may have an IgG1 or IgG2 isotype. In some embodiments, the light chain constant region is a kappa chain. In other embodiments, the light chain constant region may be a lambda chain.

An anti-HbD antibody of the invention can be raised, for example, against the immunogen H6-KLH:H₂N-CYGVLAHHFGKQFTPPVQAA-CONH₂, or against mixtures of native and/or denatured HbD and H6-KLH:H₂N-CYGVLAHHFGKQFTPPVQAA-CONH₂, or by using combinations of, or sequential injections of, the various immunogens. Other immunogenic peptides useful in obtaining an antibody having the desired HbD binding specificity will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art.

An anti-HbD antibody typically binds to both glycated and nonglycated foams of HbD with similar affinity. For example, an anti-HbD antibody typically selectively binds to both glycated and non-glycated HbD with a binding reactivity in which there is less than a three-fold reactivity difference, typically less than a two-fold reactivity difference, between binding to glycated vs. non-glycated HbD.

Pan-Reactive Antibodies

The invention also provides pan-reactive antibodies for use in the invention. Such antibodies bind to multiple forms of hemoglobin. Pan-reactive antibodies can be produced using a number of different immunogens, including H5bis-KLH:H₂N-CYGVTALWGKVNVDEVGGK-CONH₂ or H1-KLH:H₂N-VHLTPEEKSAVTALW-C-CONH₂. Such peptide immunogens can be injected either in a mixture with native or denatured HbA₀, or sequentially with native and/or denatured HbA0. As understood in the art, any number of Hb immunogens can be used to obtain a 11b antibody that selectively binds to HbA₀ as well as Hb variants. Pan-reactive antibodies may be monoclonal or polyclonal. Pan-reactive antibodies can also be obtained by immunization with native or denatured hemoglobin without using peptide immunogens.

In some embodiments, a pan-reactive polyclonal antibody for use in the invention binds to one or more epitopes present in the following regions of alpha globin and beta globin: alpha globin ⁴⁹SHGSAQVKGHGKKVADALTNAVAHVDDMPNALSALSDHLHAHKLRRVDPV⁹⁶, beta globin ¹⁵WGKVNVDEVGGEALG²⁹, ⁴⁵FGDLSTP⁵¹, and ⁷⁶AHLDNLKGTFAT⁸⁷.

In one embodiment, a pan-reactive antibody binds to the beta globin epitope ⁹SAVTALWGKVNV²⁰. In some embodiments, the antibody binds to the beta globin epitope ¹¹VTALW¹⁵. In some embodiments ¹¹VT¹² and ¹⁴LW¹⁵ are important for binding.

In some embodiments, a pan-reactive antibody binds to beta and alpha globin eptiopes that contain the following sequences: a beta globin minimal epitope ⁸KSAVTALWGKVNV²⁰, a beta globin minimal epitope ⁵⁸PKVKAHGKKVLGAF⁷¹ and a beta globin minimal epitope ⁸⁷TLSELHCDKLHVDPENFR¹⁰⁴. In some embodiments residues ¹³ALWG¹⁶ are important for binding.

The antibody typically is an IgG, e.g., the antibody may have an IgG1, IgG2, or IgG3 isotype. In some embodiments, the light chain constant region is a kappa chain. In other embodiments, the light chain constant region may be a lambda chain.

A pan-reactive antibody used in the invention is broadly reactive to hemoglobin and binds to both glycated and non-glycated forms of hemoglobin A and variants such as HbS, HbC, HbD, and HbE.

In some embodiments of the invention, a pan-reactive antibody that binds to multiple forms of hemoglobin is used as a labeled binding member that binds to all of the analytes, thereby labeling the bound analytes. Thus, for example, a labeled pan-reactive polyclonal antibody that binds to the epitopes: alpha globin ⁴⁹SHGSAQVKGHGKVADALTNAVAHVDDMPNALSALSDHLHAHKLRRVDPV⁹⁶, beta globin ¹⁶GKVNVDEVGGEALG²⁹, ⁴⁶GDLSTP⁵¹, and ⁷⁸LDNLKGTFAT⁸⁷ can be used as a universal detection antibody that binds to all of the analytes (forms of hemoglobin) being assayed, thereby labeling the bound analytes.

Anti-HbA_(1c), Antibodies

The invention additionally provides anti-HbA_(1c), antibodies that have a binding specificity for glycated hemoglobin. Such antibodies can be produced using an immunogen such as GP3-KLH:1-deoxyfructopyranosyl-HN-VHLTPEE-Hx-C-CONH₂. The antibody can be an IgG, for example, and can have an IgG₁, IgG₂, or IgG₃ isotype. In some embodiments, the light chain constant region is a lambda chain. In other embodiments, the light chain constant region is a kappa chain.

An anti-HbA_(1c) antibody of the invention is highly specific for glycated hemoglobin, including HbA_(1c), HbS_(1c), HbD_(1c), HbE_(1c), and HbC_(1c), and does not recognize non-glycated forms of hemoglobin (i.e., the antibody has at least a 100-fold greater affinity for HbA_(1c), HbS _(1c), HbD_(1c), HbE_(1c), and HbC_(1c) than for the non-glycated forms). Such antibodies typically have a binding specificity for glycated N-terminal peptide where both glycated valine 1 and histidine 2 are important residues for binding.

An A_(1c) monoclonal antibody has a binding specificity in competitive binding experiments such that the glycated peptide GP3 (1-deoxyfructopyranosyl-HN-VHLTPEE-Hx-C-CONH₂) competes for binding to native HbA_(1c), but unglycated peptides such as RW1a (VHLTPEE-CONH) do not.

HbF and HbA₂ Antibodies

HbF and HbA₂ can also be assayed using the methods of the invention. Antibodies that selectively bind to HbF relative to HbA₀ or other Hb proteins; or to HbA₂ relative to HbA₀ or other Hb proteins, can be obtained using immunogens comprising peptide sequences that are specific to HbF or sequences that are specific to HbA₂, as there are multiple differences in the delta and gamma chains relative to the A₀ beta chain.

Generation of Antibodies

The anti-hemoglobin antibodies of the invention can be raised against hemoglobin proteins, or fragments, or produced recombinantly. Any number of techniques well known in the art can be used to determine antibody binding specificity. See, e.g., Harlow & Lane, Antibodies, A Laboratory Manual (1988) for a description of immunoassay formats and conditions that can be used to determine specific immunoreactivity of an antibody

In some embodiments, an antibody for use in the invention, e.g., a hemoglobin antibody that binds various forms of hemoglobin, a hemoglobin antibody specific for a variant, or a hemoglobin antibody specific for glycated hemoglobin, is a polyclonal antibody. For example, an antibody specific for a hemoglobin variant can be an affinity-purified monospecific polyclonal antibody. Methods of preparing polyclonal antibodies are known to the skilled artisan (e.g., Harlow & Lane, Antibodies, A Laboratory manual (1988); Methods in Immunology). Polyclonal antibodies can be raised in a mammal by one or more injections of an immunizing agent and, if desired, an adjuvant.

In some embodiments, the antibody for use in the invention, e.g., an antibody that binds to multiple forms of hemoglobin, an antibody that is specific for a hemoglobin variant (and the glycated hemoglobin variant), or an antibody that is specific for glycated hemoglobin, is a monoclonal antibody. Monoclonal antibodies may be prepared using hybridoma methods, such as those described by Kohler & Milstein, Nature 256:495 (1975). In a hybridoma method, a mouse, rat, rabbit, or other appropriate host animal, is typically immunized with an immunizing agent to elicit lymphocytes that produce or are capable of producing antibodies that will specifically bind to the immunizing agent. Alternatively, the lymphocytes may be immunized in vitro.

As stated above, antibodies of the invention can be generated using any number of immunogens and immunization protocols. In some embodiments, the immunogen is a peptide that is administered in combination with a native or denatured hemoglobin protein. As understood in the art, an immunogen may be administered multiple times. In embodiments in which a combination is employed, the combination of antigens may be administered concurrently, or sequentially, in any order. In some embodiments, a peptide immunogen is a KLH conjugate, however, carrier proteins other than KLH can be used, e.g., BSA conjugates can be used.

Assay Conditions Using the Antibodies

In the practice of this invention, hemoglobin A_(1c), hemoglobin variants, and total hemoglobin can be measured via a variety of immunoassay formats. One example is the sandwich format, in which a specific antibody to the analyte is attached to the solid phase bead, and detection is accomplished by interrogating the beads with one or more antibodies to the hemoglobin species. A universal antibody which binds to all hemoglobin species can be used for the interrogation, but two or more detection antibodies can also be used. An example is shown in FIG. 1, where individual antibodies are used that are specific to total hemoglobin, HbA_(1c), and the four most prevalent hemoglobin variation species HbS, HbC, HbE, and HbD, respectively, are bound to separate subpopulations of beads, while a universal antibody that binds to all hemoglobin species and that bears phycoerythrin (PE) as a label is used. In a sandwich assay format, the quantity of antibody for each assay is selected such that the analyte (the particular form of hemoglobin to which the assay is directed) is in excess, so that the antibodies are the limiting reagents in the binding reactions. Competition between the antibody for total hemoglobin and the antibodies for the individual hemoglobins, for example, is thereby minimized. By adjusting the assay parameters and selection of the appropriate antibodies in a manner within the skill of the art, however, a competitive assay format can also be utilized for multiplexed detection of hemoglobin species.

While the multiplex assay can be utilized on mammalian blood samples in general, the assay is of particular value to samples of human blood. Blood samples are prepared for the assay by lysis of the cells and dilution of the lysate to a concentration suitable for immunoassay. Each of these steps is performed by methods known in the art. Dilution can be achieved with water, solutions containing saponin, or any other diluent that will not affect the hemoglobins or their immunological binding activity, and the degree of dilution can vary widely. In most cases, the dilution will be within the range of about 1:25 to about 1:3000. The hemoglobins in the lysate can be denatured before or after dilution of the lysate and used in the assay, or the lysate can be used without denaturation of the hemoglobins. In most cases, denaturation is preferred, and can be performed by methods known in the art.

The levels of HbA_(1c) and each of the variants are preferably each expressed as a percentage of total hemoglobin in the sample. For determinations of degrees of glycation in the presence of a hemoglobin variant, the invention offers three options. One option, which is compatible with the currently accepted method, is the determination of the HbA_(1c) level by the result from the HbA_(1c) bead only, normalized to total hemoglobin. The second option is the determination of the total hemoglobin glycation by adding the percent of the glycated form of the variant to the percent HbA_(1c). The third option, which is useful in the event that the determination of HbA_(1c) is adversely affected by the presence of the variant, is to adjust the as-measured percent HbA_(1c) by a correction factor that is a function of the detected level of the variant. The function can be determined empirically by a relation that can be independently determined by separate assays, including non-multiplex assays. The correction factor can be one that is applied either to the HbA_(1c) concentration after the concentration has been normalized with respect to total hemoglobin, or to the concentration prior to normalization.

To illustrate the correction of the HbA_(1c) value, assays were performed on samples from ten patients, using both a bead-based assay (BioPlex 2200 of Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Hercules, Calif., USA) in accordance with the present invention and an HPLC assay (Variant™ II of Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.), both assays determining percent HbA_(1c) as a function of increasing percentage of HbC. The results are shown in Table 3 and in FIG. 2, in which the “Difference Ratio”=(% A_(1c), Variant II−% A_(1c) BioPlex 2200)/(% A_(1c) Variant II).

TABLE 3 % A_(1c) Variant Adjusted Patient BioPlex II Difference BioPlex Difference from Target ID % HbC 2200 (Target) Ratio Value Adjusted Unadjusted PT 200 31.8 6.06 5.9 −0.03 5.73 0.17 −0.16 PT 219 32.1 6.30 5.8 −0.09 5.98 −0.18 −0.50 PT 265 33.7 5.71 5.4 −0.06 5.37 0.03 −0.31 PT 622 34.1 6.20 5.9 −0.05 5.87 0.03 −0.30 PT 658 33.9 5.92 5.9 0.00 5.59 0.31 −0.02 PT 667 33.5 6.00 5.8 −0.03 5.67 0.13 −0.20 PT 32.1 6.14 6.1 −0.01 5.81 0.29 −0.04 m832 PT 37.6 5.80 5.5 −0.05 5.47 0.03 −0.30 m837 PT 39.2 5.37 4.6 −0.17 5.03 −0.43 −0.77 m908 PT 41.1 5.53 4.8 −0.15 5.19 −0.39 −0.73 m923 average difference 0.00 −0.33

While various mathematical models can be used to quantify the relationship of the percent HbA_(1c) difference as a function of percent hemoglobin C (or any hemoglobin variant), the mathematical model used in this example is a simple linear regression model. Using this model, the values obtained from the BioPlex 2200 immunoassay can be corrected to yield a result comparable to the reference method. This is demonstrated by the average difference of the adjusted BioPlex 2200 percent HbA_(1c) value relative to the target percent HbA_(1c) value determined by the reference Variant II method. In Table 3 and FIG. 2, the average difference is zero for the adjusted HbA_(1c) values compared to −0.33 for the corresponding unadjusted values. The corrected HbA_(1c) value shown in the table provides a better estimate of the glycemic index of the individual.

The BioPlex 2200 bead-based immunoassay used in the obtaining the data in Table 3 and FIG. 2 utilizes an antibody that binds HbA_(1c) and all hemoglobin variants including HbS, HbC, HbD, and HbE. All glycated variants and HbA₀ are bound with approximately the same affinity and avidity by the antibody. The immunoassay result thus represents total glycated hemoglobin, which in the case of a heterozygous hemoglobin AS variant, is the combined value that includes both the HbA_(1c) and HbS_(1c) species. In individuals exhibiting a hemoglobin variant phenotype, the proportion of the glycated hemoglobin corresponding to the variant provides an improved measure of glycemic status. The percent HbS_(1c) in the sample is obtained by multiplying the total percent HbA_(1c) plus HbS_(1c) value by the proportion of HbS in the sample. For example, for a patient sample with a total glycated hemoglobin value of 5.54% (consisting of HbA_(1c) and HbS_(1c)), multiplying this value by the proportion of HbS in the sample of 38.8% yields a value for HbS_(1c) of 2.14%. The remainder of the glycated material is HbA_(1c) at 3.4%. This again is but one mathematical model; more sophisticated mathematical models can be used to provide more accurate results as needed.

The beads that provide the surfaces on which the binding reactions occur in the practice of this invention can be formed of any material that is inert to the assay materials and to the components of the sample itself, and that is solid and insoluble in the sample and in any other solvents or carriers used in the assay. Polymers are preferred, and the beads are preferably microparticles. The polymeric can be any material that can be formed into a microparticle and is capable of coupling to an antibody at a region on the antibody that does not interfere with the antigen-binding regions of the antibody. In embodiments in which fluorescent labels are used, preferred polymers are also those that produce at most a minimal level of autofluorescence. Examples of suitable polymers are polyesters, polyethers, polyolefins, polyalkylene oxides, polyamides, polyurethanes, polysaccharides, celluloses, and polyisoprenes. Crosslinking is useful in many polymers for imparting structural integrity and rigidity to the microparticle. Magnetic beads can also be used.

Attachment of the antibodies to the surfaces of the beads can be achieved by electrostatic attraction, specific affinity interaction, hydrophobic interaction, or covalent bonding. Covalent bonding is preferred. Functional groups for covalent bonding can be incorporated into the polymer structure by conventional means, such as the use of monomers that contain the functional groups, either as the sole monomer or as a co-monomer. Examples of suitable functional groups are amine groups (—NH₂), ammonium groups (—NH₃ ⁺ or —NR₃ ⁺), hydroxyl groups (—OH), carboxylic acid groups (—COOH), and isocyanate groups (—NCO). Useful monomers for introducing carboxylic acid groups into polyolefins, for example, are acrylic acid and methacrylic acid. Linking groups can also be used for increasing the density of the antibodies on the solid phase surface and for decreasing steric hindrance to increase the range and sensitivity of the assay. Examples of suitable useful linking groups are polylysine, polyaspartic acid, polyglutamic acid and polyarginine.

The size range of the beads can vary and particular size ranges are not critical to the invention. In most cases, the aggregated size range of the beads lies within the range of from about 0.3 micrometers to about 100 micrometers in diameter, and preferably within the range of from about 0.5 micrometers to about 40 micrometers.

Multiplexing with the use of beads in accordance with this invention is achieved by assigning the beads to two or more groups, also referred to herein as bead sets or subpopulations. Each group will have affixed thereto an antibody selected for either a hemoglobin variant, a glycated variant, HbA_(1c), or total hemoglobin, and will be separable or at least distinguishable from the other group(s) by a “differentiation parameter.” The “differentiation parameter” can be any distinguishable characteristic that permits separate detection of the assay result in one group from those in the other groups. One example of a differentiation parameter is the particle size, with each group having a size range that does not overlap with the size ranges of the other groups. The widths of the size ranges and the spacing between mean diameters of different size ranges are selected to permit differentiation of the groups by flow cytometry according to size, and will be readily apparent to those skilled in the use of and instrumentation for flow cytometry. In this specification, the term “mean diameter” refers to a number average diameter. In most cases, a preferred size range width is one with a CV of about ±5% or less of the mean diameter, where CV is the coefficient of variation and is defined as the standard deviation of the particle diameter divided by the mean particle diameter times 100 percent. The minimum spacing between mean diameters among the various size ranges can vary depending on the size distribution, the ease of segregating beads by size for purposes of attaching different antibodies, and the type and sensitivity of the flow cytometry equipment. In most cases, best results will be achieved when the mean diameters of different size ranges are spaced apart by at least about 6% of the mean diameter of one of the size ranges, preferably at least about 8% of the mean diameter of one of the size ranges and most preferably at least about 10% of the mean diameter of one of the size ranges. Another preferred size range width relation is that in which the standard deviation of the particle diameters within each size range is less than one third of the separation of the mean diameters of adjacent size ranges.

Another example of a differentiation parameter that can be used to distinguish among the various groups of beads is fluorescence. Differentiation by fluorescence is accomplished by incorporating fluorescent materials in the beads, the materials having different fluorescent emission spectra for each group of beads and being distinguishable on this basis.

Fluorescence can thus be used both as a differentiation parameter and as a means for detecting that binding has occurred in the assays performed on the beads. The latter can be achieved by fluorescent labels serving as assay reporters. Thus, while individual groups can be distinguished by emitting different emission spectra, and the emission spectra used for group differentiation purposes can themselves differ from the emission spectra of the assay reporters. An example of a fluorescent substance that can be used as a differentiation parameter is fluorescein and an example of a substance that can be used for the assay detection is phycoerythrin. Different bead groups can be distinguished from each other by being dyed with different concentrations of fluorescein. Different bead groups can be distinguished by using fluorescent materials that have different fluorescence intensities or that emit fluorescence at different wavelengths. The dyes can also be used in combinations to produce a plurality of fluorescent emissions at different wavelengths, and the wavelength difference can be used both as the differentiation parameter and as a means of distinguishing the differentiation parameter from the assay reporter.

Still other examples of useful differentiation parameters are light scatter, light emission, or combinations of light scatter and emission. Side-angle light scatter varies with particle size, granularity, absorbance and surface roughness, while forward-angle light scatter is mainly affected by size and refractive index. Any of these qualities can thus be used as the differentiation parameter.

According to one means of differentiation, the beads will have two or more fluorochromes incorporated within them so that each bead in the array will have at least three distinguishable parameters associated with it, i.e., side scatter together with fluorescent emissions at two separate wavelengths. A red fluorochrome such as Cy5 can thus be used together with an orange fluorochrome such as Cy5.5. Additional fluorochromes can be used to expand the system further. Each bead can thus contain a plurality of fluorescent dyes at varying wavelengths.

Still another example of a differentiation parameter that can be used to distinguish among the various groups of beads is absorbance. When light is applied to beads the absorbance of the light by the beads is indicated mostly by the strength of the laterally (side-angle) scattered light while the strength of the forward-scattered light is relatively unaffected. Consequently, the difference in absorbance between various colored dyes associated with the beads is determined by observing differences in the strength of the laterally scattered light.

A still further example of a differentiation parameter that can be used to distinguish among the various groups of beads is the number of beads in each group. The number of beads of each group in an assay is varied in a known way, and the count of beads having various assay responses is determined. The various responses are associated with a particular assay by the number of beads having each response.

As the above examples illustrate, a wide array of parameters or characteristics can be used as differentiation parameters to distinguish the beads of one group from those of another.

The differentiation parameters may arise from size, composition, physical characteristics that affect light scattering, excitable fluorescent or colored dyes that impart different emission spectra and/or scattering characteristics to the beads, or different concentrations of one or more fluorescent dyes. When the differentiation parameter is a fluorescent dye or color, it can be coated on the surface of the beads, embedded in the beads, or bound to the molecules of the bead material. Thus, fluorescent beads can be manufactured by combining the polymer material with the fluorescent dye, or by impregnating the beads with the dye. Beads with dyes already incorporated and thereby suitable for use in the present invention are commercially available, from suppliers such as Spherotech, Inc. (Libertyville, Ill., USA) and Molecular Probes, Inc. (Eugene, Oreg., USA). A list of vendors of flow cytometric products can be found on the Internet, e.g., at the world wide web molbio.princeton.edu/facs/FCMsites.html site.

Detection and differentiation in accordance with this invention are performed by flow cytometry. Methods of and instrumentation for flow cytometry are known in the art, and those that are known can be used in the practice of the present invention. Flow cytometry in general resides in the passage of a suspension of beads or microparticles as a stream past a light beam and electro-optical sensors, in such a manner that only one particle at a time passes through the region. As each particle passes this region, the light beam is perturbed by the presence of the particle, and the resulting scattered and fluorescent light are detected. The optical signals are used by the instrumentation to identify the subgroup to which each particle belongs, along with the presence and amount of label, so that individual assay results are achieved. Descriptions of instrumentation and methods for flow cytometry are found in the literature. Examples are McHugh, “Flow Microsphere Immunoassay for the Quantitative and Simultaneous Detection of Multiple Soluble Analytes,” Methods in Cell Biology 42, Part B (Academic Press, 1994); McHugh et al., “Microsphere-Based Fluorescence Immunoassays Using Flow Cytometry Instrumentation,” Clinical Flow Cytometry, Bauer, K. D., et al., eds. (Baltimore, Md., USA: Williams and Williams, 1993), pp. 535-544; Lindmo et al., “Immunometric Assay Using Mixtures of Two Particle Types of Different Affinity,” J. Immunol. Meth. 126: 183-189 (1990); McHugh, “Flow Cytometry and the Application of Microsphere-Based Fluorescence Immunoassays,” Immunochemica 5: 116 (1991); Horan et al., “Fluid Phase Particle Fluorescence Analysis: Rheumatoid Factor Specificity Evaluated by Laser Flow Cytophotometry,” Immunoassays in the Clinical Laboratory, 185-189 (Liss 1979); Wilson et al., “A New Microsphere-Based Immunofluorescence Assay Using Flow Cytometry,” J. Immunol. Meth. 107: 225-230 (1988); Fulwyler et al., “Flow Microsphere Immunoassay for the Quantitative and Simultaneous Detection of Multiple Soluble Analytes,” Meth. Cell Biol. 33: 613-629 (1990); Coulter Electronics Inc., United Kingdom Patent No. 1,561,042 (published Feb. 13, 1980); and Steinkamp et al., Review of Scientific Instruments 44(9): 1301-1310 (1973).

Example 1

This example presents the binding activities of six hemoglobin candidate antibodies for use in the practice of this invention. The six antibodies are:

19E10-E7 (HbS specific) 7B3-2C3-1G10 (HbD specific) 12C8-A11 (HbC specific) 13G7-E8-3H3 (HbA_(1c) specific) 4A10-2D6-2G8 (HbE specific) 3E5-DLE10-3A3 (pan-reactive).

19E10-E7 binds to a beta globin minimal epitope ⁵PVEKSAVT¹². ⁵PVE⁷ and A¹⁰ are important for binding. L³ and T⁴ also contribute to binding activity. Additional epitope mapping experiments showed that V⁶ can be replaced with I without loss of binding activity.

12C8-A11 binds to a beta globin minimal epitope ⁴TPKEKSAVT¹². T⁴ and K⁶ are important for binding. L³ also contributes to binding. Additional epitope mapping experiments showed that K⁶ can be replaced with R without reducing binding activity.

4A10-2D6-2G8 binds a beta globin minimal epitope ²²EVGGK²⁶. ²²EV²³ and K²⁶ are important for binding. D²¹ also contributes to binding. Additional epitope mapping experiments showed that K²⁶ can be replaced with S or T without loss of binding activity.

7B3-2C3-1G10 binds to a beta globin minimal eptiope ¹²¹QFTPP¹²⁵. G¹¹⁹ also contributes to binding.

The antibody binding kinetics were analyzed using the ProteOn XPR36 (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.) for protein-protein interactions. The different antibodies (10 μg of each) were amine-coupled to the sensor chip such that one antibody was immobilized per channel. Antigen was employed in the range of from 200 to 13 nM. The results of the kinetic analysis are summarized in Table 4 below.

Each antibody had a high affinity for its specific hemoglobin. The pan-reactive antibody also had good affinity constants to the different antigens, but lower than the affinity constant exhibited by the specific variant antibodies for their respective antigens. Except for 19E10-E7, all of the variant antibodies did not bind HbA0, so the affinity constants were essentially zero. For the 19E10-E7 anti HbS antibody, a low level of binding to HbA0 was observed, with an affinity constant of 6.5 10⁻⁷ M, which is 2 logs less than the affinity constant for HbS.

TABLE 4 Kinetics analysis for 6 specific monoclonal antibodies to hemoglobin and hemoglobin variants k_(a) (1/Ms) K_(d) (1/s) K_(D) (M) 19E10-E7 HbS 7.6 10⁴ 6.3 10⁻⁴ 8.3 10⁻⁹ 12C8-A11 HbC 7.3 10⁴ 4.5 10⁻⁴ 6.1 10⁻⁹ 4A10-2D6 HbE 7.1 10⁴ 6.2 10⁻⁵  8.7 10⁻¹⁰ 7B3-2C3 HbD 1.4 10⁵ 1.1 10⁻³ 7.4 10⁻⁹ 13G7-E8 HbA_(1c) 1.2 10⁴ 2.3 10⁻⁵ 1.9 10⁻⁹ 3E5-DLE10 HbS 3.9 10⁴ 7.9 10⁻⁴ 2.0 10⁻⁸ HbE 2.9 10⁴ 4.4 10⁻⁴ 1.5 10⁻⁸ HbD 3.4 10⁴ 1.0 10⁻³ 3.0 10⁻⁸ HbA_(1c) 3.7 10⁴ 9.4 10⁻⁴ 2.5 10⁻⁸ HbC 4.5 10⁴ 7.4 10⁻⁴ 1.6 10⁻⁸ HbA0 1.4 10⁴ 3.4 10⁻³ 2.4 10⁻⁷

Example 2

This examples demonstrates the measurement of hemoglobin A_(1c) and hemoglobin variant proteins as percentages of total hemoglobin using a sandwich immunoassay in accordance with this invention. Solid phase capture bead immunoreagents were developed utilizing the six monoclonal antibodies specific to HbA₀, HbA_(1c), HbS, HbC, HbE, and HbD described in Example 1.

Antibodies to each of the six target antigens were coupled covalently to paramagnetic beads. Each bead was dyed to contain a specific fluorescent signal that was unique to each antibody, to enable subsequent differentiation in a flow cytometry detector. The six antibody-coupled beads were mixed to create a multiplex bead reagent. A detection antibody reagent was prepared using a phycoerythrin-labelled polyclonal antibody with reactivity to all hemoglobin species. A diagram of the various beads and the species bound to each in the assay is shown in FIG. 1.

The assay was performed by adding samples of whole blood and calibrators (5 μL) to a solution of buffered denaturant (10 μL), to expose all of the epitopes of the hemoglobin species present in the samples in order to make them available for binding by the solid phase antibodies. After denaturation for 10 minutes at 37 degrees, the bead reagent (250 μL) was added to the samples, followed by an additional incubation for 20 minutes at 37 degrees. The reaction mixture was washed four times with phosphate-buffered saline containing 0.1% Tween-20 (PBST, 100 μL each) detergent to remove all of the unbound proteins from the sample, leaving the beads with their bound hemoglobin targets. The beads were re-suspended in PBST containing phycoerythrin-labelled antibody reagent (25 μL), and incubated for 20 minutes at 37 degrees Celsius.

After washing four times with PBST (100 μL each), the beads were resuspended in PBST and processed through a Luminex flow cytometry detector to interrogate the beads for binding of the individual hemoglobin species present in the samples. For example, samples from homozygous hemoglobin AA individuals exhibited signal from the HbA1c and HbA0 beads, and samples from heterozygous hemoglobin variant individuals exhibited signal from the HbA₀, HbA_(1c) and the specific hemoglobin variant beads. The phycoerythrin-derived fluorescent signal of each bead was measured for the samples and calibrators. A calibration curve was constructed for each hemoglobin analyte using the signal from the bead and the known dose of the respective calibrators. The concentration of the hemoglobin analytes in each sample was determined from their fluorescent signal and the established dose-response of the calibration curve. Percent HbA_(1c) and percent hemoglobin variant, if any, in the samples were determined by dividing the concentration of hemoglobin A_(1c) or variant hemoglobin protein by the concentration of HbA₀, each derived from their respective bead. In the case of heterozygous hemoglobin variant-containing samples (such as HbAS, for example), the percent A_(1c) value derived from the ratio of the A_(1c) to HbA₀ concentrations was adjusted when needed using the concentration of the hemoglobin variant present in the sample, to provide a value that best reflected the true glycemic index of the individual.

In the claims appended hereto, the term “a” or “an” is intended to mean “one or more.” The term “comprise” and variations thereof such as “comprises” and “comprising,” when preceding the recitation of a step or an element, are intended to mean that the addition of further steps or elements is optional and not excluded. All patents, patent applications, and other published reference materials cited in this specification are hereby incorporated herein by reference in their entirety for their disclosures of the subject matter in whose connection they are cited herein. Any discrepancy between any reference material cited herein or any prior art in general and an explicit teaching of this specification is intended to be resolved in favor of the teaching in this specification. This includes any discrepancy between an art-understood definition of a word or phrase and a definition explicitly provided in this specification of the same word or phrase. 

1. A method for individually detecting a plurality of hemoglobin-containing analytes comprising HbA_(1c), and a plurality of hemoglobin variants in a single sample of blood cell lysate, said method comprising: (a) incubating said sample with a population of beads, said population consisting of a plurality of subpopulations in a common mixture, each bead of said population having bonded thereto one of a plurality of classifier dyes that are equal in number to said analytes and that are selected such that said classifier dyes, and thereby said subpopulations, are differentiable from each other by fluorescent emissions emitted by said classifier dyes upon excitation, each said subpopulation further having bonded thereto an immunological binding member having selective binding affinity toward one of said analytes, to cause each analyte to bind to a different bead subpopulation through the immunological binding members bonded to said subpopulations; (b) with said analytes bound to the beads of said subpopulations, incubating said population with a labeled binding member that binds to all of said analytes, thereby labeling said analytes thus bound; and (c) with said bound analytes so labeled, detecting labels bound to said bound analytes while differentiating said labels so detected according to subpopulations by fluorescent emissions, thereby individually detecting said analytes.
 2. The method of claim 1 wherein said plurality of hemoglobin-containing analytes consists of total hemoglobin, HbA_(1c), and said plurality of hemoglobin variants.
 3. The method of claim 2, wherein the immunological binding member having selective binding affinity for HbA_(1c) is a monoclonal antibody.
 4. The method of claim 1 wherein said plurality of hemoglobin variants includes at least one of HbS, HbC, HbE, or HbD.
 5. The method of claim 4, wherein said immunological binding member having selective affinity for hemoglobin variant HbC, HbS, HbD, or HbE is a monoclonal antibody that selectively binds the variant and the glycated variant.
 6. The method of claim 5, wherein the variant is HbC and the immunological binding member having selective affinity for HbC and glycated HbC is a monoclonal antibody that binds to a HbC minimal epitope ⁴TPKEKSAVT¹² (SEQ ID NO:1).
 7. The method of claim 5, wherein the variant is HbS and the immunological binding member having selective affinity for HbS and glycated HbS is a monoclonal antibody that binds to a HbS minimal epitope ³LTPVEKSAVT¹² (SEQ ID NO:3).
 8. The method of claim 5, wherein the variant is HbE and the immunological binding member having selective binding affinity for HbE and glycated HbE is a monoclonal antibody that binds to a HbE minimal epitope ²²EVGGK²⁶ (SEQ ID NO:6) or ²¹DEVGGK²⁶ (SEQ ID NO:7).
 9. The method of claim 5, wherein the variant is HbD and the immunological binding member having selective binding affinity for HbD and glycated HbD is a monoclonal antibody that binds to a HbD minimal epitope ¹²¹QFTPP¹²⁵ (SEQ ID NO:8) or ¹¹⁹GKQFTPP¹²⁵ (SEQ ID NO:46).
 10. The method of claim 1 wherein said plurality of bead subpopulations does not include a subpopulation binding to total hemoglobin, and said method further comprises determining total hemoglobin by a non-immunoassay method.
 11. The method of claim 1, wherein said plurality of bead subpopulations comprises a subpopulation binding to total hemoglobin, wherein said immunological binding member having selective binding affinity toward total hemoglobin is a monoclonal antibody.
 12. The method of claim 11, wherein said monoclonal antibody binds to a beta globin chain minimal epitope ⁹SAVTALWGKVNV²⁰ (SEQ ID NO:15), ⁸KSAVTALWGKVNV²⁰ (SEQ ID NO:16), or ¹¹VTALW¹⁵ (SEQ ID NO:17).
 13. The method of claim 1, wherein said plurality of bead subpopulations comprises a subpopulation binding to total hemoglobin, wherein said immunological binding member having selective binding affinity toward total hemoglobin is a polyclonal antibody.
 14. The method of claim 1, wherein the blood cell lysate is a denatured blood cell lysate.
 15. The method of claim 1, wherein the sample is from a diabetic patient.
 16. A method for determining the proportion of HbA_(1c) relative to total hemoglobin in a sample of blood cell lysate, adjusted for the possible presence in said lysate of a hemoglobin variant that interferes with the measurement of HbA_(1c), said method comprising: (a) incubating said sample with a population of beads, said population consisting of a plurality of subpopulations in a common mixture, each bead of said population having bonded thereto one of a plurality of classifier dyes selected such that said classifier dyes, and thereby said subpopulations, are differentiable from each other by fluorescent emissions emitted by said classifier dyes upon excitation, each said subpopulation further having bonded thereto an immunological binding member having selective binding affinity toward one of a plurality of analytes, said plurality comprising HbA_(1c) and said hemoglobin variant, to cause each of said analytes to bind to a different bead subpopulation through the immunological binding member bonded thereto; (b) with said analytes bound to the beads of said subpopulations, incubating said population with a labeled binding member that binds to all of said analytes, thereby labeling said analytes so bound; (c) with said bound analytes so labeled, detecting labels bound to said bound analytes while differentiating said labels so detected according to subpopulations by fluorescent emissions, thereby individually detecting concentrations of said analytes in said sample; and (d) determining from said concentrations the proportion of HbA_(1c) relative to total hemoglobin, adjusted for the concentration of said hemoglobin variant by an adjustment factor empirically derived from a predetermined relation between said hemoglobin variant concentration and the concentration of said HbA_(1c) so detected.
 17. The method of claim 16 wherein said plurality of analytes further comprises total hemoglobin.
 18. The method of claim 16 wherein said plurality of bead subpopulations does not include a subpopulation binding to total hemoglobin, and said method further comprises determining total hemoglobin by a non-immunoassay method.
 19. The method of claim 16, wherein the immunological binding member having selective binding affinity for HbA_(1c) is a monoclonal antibody.
 20. The method of claim 16, wherein said plurality of bead subpopulations comprises a subpopulation binding to total hemoglobin, wherein said immunological binding member having selective binding affinity toward total hemoglobin is a monoclonal antibody.
 21. The method of claim 20, wherein said monoclonal antibody binds to a beta globin chain minimal epitope ⁹SAVTALWGKVNV²⁰ (SEQ ID NO:15), ⁸KSAVTALWGKVNV²⁰ (SEQ ID NO:16), or ¹¹VTALW¹⁵ (SEQ ID NO:17).
 22. The method of claim 16, wherein said plurality of bead subpopulations comprises a subpopulation binding to total hemoglobin, and wherein said immunological binding member having selective binding affinity toward total hemoglobin is a polyclonal antibody.
 23. The method of claim 16 wherein the blood cell lysate is a denatured blood cell lysate.
 24. The method of claim 16, wherein said hemoglobin variant is selected from the group consisting of HbC, HbS, HbD, and HbE.
 25. The method of claim 24, wherein the immunological binding member that selectively binds to hemoglobin variant HbC, HbS, HbD, or HbE is a monoclonal antibody that binds to the hemoglobin variant and the glycated variant.
 26. The method of claim 25, wherein said hemoglobin variant is HbC and said immunological binding member having selective binding affinity for HbC is a monoclonal antibody that binds to a HbC minimal epitope ⁴TPKEKSAVT¹² (SEQ ID NO:1).
 27. The method of claim 25, wherein said hemoglobin variant is HbS and the immunological binding member having selective binding affinity for the variant is a monoclonal antibody that binds to a HbS minimal epitope ³LTPVEKSAVT¹² (SEQ ID NO:3).
 28. The method of claim 25, wherein said hemoglobin variant is HbE and the immunological binding member having selective binding affinity for the variant is a monoclonal antibody that binds to a HbE minimal epitope ²²EVGGK²⁶ (SEQ ID NO:6) or ²¹DEVGGK²⁶ (SEQ ID NO:7).
 29. The method of claim 25, wherein said hemoglobin variant is HbD and the immunological binding member having selective binding affinity for the variant is a monoclonal antibody that binds to a HbD minimal epitope ¹²¹QFTPP¹²⁵ (SEQ ID NO:8) or ¹¹⁹GKQFTPP¹²⁵ (SEQ ID NO:46).
 30. The method of claim 16, wherein the sample is from a diabetic patient.
 31. A method for determining the proportion of a glycated hemoglobin variant relative to total hemoglobin in a sample of blood cell lysate, said method comprising: (a) incubating said sample with a population of beads, said population consisting of a plurality of subpopulations in a common mixture, each bead of said population having bonded thereto one of a plurality of classifier dyes selected such that said classifier dyes, and thereby said subpopulations, are differentiable from each other by fluorescent emissions emitted by said classifier dyes upon excitation, each said subpopulation further having bonded thereto one of a plurality of immunological binding members comprising: a first such immunological binding member having selective binding affinity for a first analyte consisting of both said glycated hemoglobin variant and HbA_(1c), and a second such immunological binding member having selective binding affinity for a second analyte consisting of both said hemoglobin variant and said glycated hemoglobin variant, and to cause said first analyte and said second analyte to bind to said first and second immunological binding members, respectively; (b) with said first and second analytes so bound, incubating said population with a labeled binding member that binds to all of said analytes, thereby labeling said analytes so bound; (c) with said bound analytes so labeled, detecting said labels while differentiating said labels so detected according to subpopulations by fluorescent emissions, thereby detecting concentrations of said first and second analytes in said sample; and (d) determining a concentration of total hemoglobin, and determining from said concentrations the proportion of said first analyte relative to total hemoglobin, and adjusting said proportion for the concentration of said second analyte relative to total hemoglobin by an adjustment factor empirically derived from a predetermined relation between said hemoglobin variant concentration and the concentration of total hemoglobin so detected, thereby determining the proportion of a glycated hemoglobin variant relative to total hemoglobin.
 32. The method of claim 31 wherein said plurality of immunological binding members further comprises a third such immunological binding member having selective affinity for total hemoglobin.
 33. The method of claim 32, wherein said third immunological binding member having selective affinity for total hemoglobin is a monoclonal antibody.
 34. The method of claim 33, wherein said monoclonal antibody binds to a beta globin chain minimal epitope wherein said monoclonal antibody binds to a beta globin chain minimal epitope ⁹SAVTALWGKVNV²⁰ (SEQ ID NO:15), ⁸KSAVTALWGKVNV²⁰ (SEQ ID NO:16), or ¹¹VTALW¹⁵ (SEQ ID NO:17).
 35. The method of claim 32, wherein said third immunological binding member having selective affinity for total hemoglobin is a polyclonal antibody.
 36. The method of claim 31 wherein said plurality of immunological binding members does not include an immunological binding member having selective affinity for total hemoglobin, and said concentration of total hemoglobin step (d) is determined by a non-immunoassay method.
 37. The method of claim 31 wherein said first immunological binding member having selective binding affinity for a first analyte is a monoclonal antibody.
 38. The method of claim 31 wherein said second immunological binding member having selective binding affinity for a second analyte is a monoclonal antibody.
 39. The method of claim 31, wherein said second analyte is selected from the group consisting of HbC, HbS, HbD, and HbE.
 40. The method of claim 39, wherein said second analyte is HbC and said second immunological binding member is a monoclonal antibody that binds to an HbC minimal epitope ⁴TPKEKSAVT¹² (SEQ ID NO:1).
 41. The method of claim 39, wherein said second analyte is HbS and said second immunological binding member is a monoclonal antibody that binds to an HbS minimal epitope ³LTPVEKSAVT¹² (SEQ ID NO:3).
 42. The method of claim 39, wherein the second analyte is HbE and the second immunological binding member is a monoclonal antibody that binds to an HbE minimal epitope ²²EVGGK²⁶ (SEQ ID NO:6) or ²¹DEVGGK²⁶ (SEQ ID NO:7).
 43. The method of claim 39, wherein the second analyte is HbD and the second immunological binding member is a monoclonal antibody that binds to a HbD minimal epitope ¹²¹QFTPP¹²⁵ (SEQ ID NO:8) or ¹¹⁹GKQFTPP¹²⁵ (SEQ ID NO:46).
 44. The method of claim 31, wherein the sample is from a diabetic patient.
 45. A monoclonal antibody that selectively binds to hemoglobin variant HbC and glycated HbC, wherein the antibody binds to a HbC minimal epitope ⁴TPKEKSAVT¹² (SEQ ID NO:1).
 46. A monoclonal antibody that selectively binds to hemoglobin variant HbS and glycated HbS, wherein the antibody binds to a HbS minimal epitope ³LTPVEKSAVT¹² (SEQ ID NO:3).
 47. A monoclonal antibody that selective binds to hemoglobin variant HbE and glycated HbE, wherein the antibody binds to a HbE minimal epitope ²²EVGGK²⁶ (SEQ ID NO:6) or ²¹DEVGGK²⁶ (SEQ ID NO:7).
 48. A monoclonal antibody that selectively binds to hemoglobin variant HbD and glycated HbD, wherein the antibody binds to a HbD minimal epitope ¹²¹QFTPP¹²⁵ (SEQ ID NO:8) or ¹¹⁹GKQFTPP¹²⁵ (SEQ ID NO:46). 